You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : September 1999

Re: Satyabhaamaa

From: Venkataraman (venkataraman_at_pacific.net.sg)
Date: Sun Sep 05 1999 - 01:15:47 PDT

I am grateful for the information that Satysbhaamaa is considered a
avataara of Bhuumaa devi.  .

Is there  any reference to her in puraaNas other than Srimad
Bhaagavatam, or in tamil prabhandams?



"Madhavakkannan, Vasudevan" wrote:
> 
> Sri:
> 
> Dear Sri Venkataraman,
> 
> I was told in an upanyasam by Sri Krishna Premi that SathyabhAmA is an
> avtaar of BhumA Devi.
> 
> Narayana Narayana
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Venkataraman [SMTP:venkataraman@pacific.net.sg]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 10:34 PM
> > To:   bhakti@lists.best.com
> > Subject:      Satyabhaamaa
> >
> > jagat-prasuuti-sthiti-naSa hetave namaH |
> >
> > The ongoing discussion about the concept of RADHA  is very
> > illuminating indeed.
> >
> > RukmiNi is  an avataara of saakshaat SriH.  We also say  * rukmiNii
> > satyabhaamaabhyaam sahitam kR'SNam aaSraye *.  Can somebody explain
> > the  Satyabhaamaa concept and how she is given equal status with
> > RukmiNi as a consort of KR'SNa.
> >
> > With my humble praNaams at the feet of all bhaagavata SiromaNi-s on
> > this list
> >
> > --  V.M.Sundaram