vibeeshana-saranagathi

From the Bhakti List Archives

• October 22, 1998


> Sri.K.M.Narayanan writes:
> 
> "...... in case if it bagavat apacharam , Here God has discreation,
> only here piratti's purushakaram comes in to picture.
> like kakasura episode etc. etc."
> 
> Isn't "purushAkAra" 'sine qua non' in all cases?
> 
> Can one set limits to "pirAtti's" "purushAkAra" and imply that it is
> "ineffective" in cases of "bAgavatha-apachAram"? 
> 
> Can any learned member on the list please enlighten or clarify please?
> 
> dAsan,
> sudarshan