| You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : October 1998 |
From: sudarshan (lucasfie_at_md2.vsnl.net.in)
Date: Thu Oct 22 1998 - 08:58:50 PDT
> Sri.K.M.Narayanan writes: > > "...... in case if it bagavat apacharam , Here God has discreation, > only here piratti's purushakaram comes in to picture. > like kakasura episode etc. etc." > > Isn't "purushAkAra" 'sine qua non' in all cases? > > Can one set limits to "pirAtti's" "purushAkAra" and imply that it is > "ineffective" in cases of "bAgavatha-apachAram"? > > Can any learned member on the list please enlighten or clarify please? > > dAsan, > sudarshan