Re: Naanmugan Thiruvandhaadhi-triplicane question.

From: narayanan kazhiyur (nkazhiyur_at_hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 11 1998 - 00:07:50 PST

• Next message: M K Krishnaswamy: "Sita Piratti's sufferings"
• Previous message: Krishna Susarla: "Re: Sita Piratti's three separations from Sri Rama"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dear  Sri.Kannan,

going by both sthalapuranam and by historic records,SriRanganatha's 
sannadi was earlier to parthasartathy.
our freind /Emperuman Sriparthasarathy  only
came as a guest there.(onda vanthava perumal)

it is natural that during first alwar period and thriumazhisai alwar,

it was only Ranganatha  the main diety in that temple and Sri 
Parthasarathi
sannadhi was not existent.

even today Sri Vedavalli thayar(presiding thayar) is only associated 
with Srui Ranganatha and
not with our freind Sri parthasarathi.

regards

K.M.Narayanan. 


>
>
>
>v
>o

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

• Next message: M K Krishnaswamy: "Sita Piratti's sufferings"
• Previous message: Krishna Susarla: "Re: Sita Piratti's three separations from Sri Rama"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

• Bhakti List: [archives] [about]
• Sri Vaishnava Home Page