| You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : November 1996 |
From: Parthasarati Dileepan (dileepan_at_utc.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 22 1996 - 05:21:02 PST
At 04:52 PM 11/21/96 -0500, Srinivasan K wrote: > > >Many (non-Brahmin) Tamil scholars question the translation of andhaNar >as Brahmin. It probably did not mean a caste. But meant noble people. These non-brahmin Tamil scholars (were) are members and sympathizers of Dravidar Kazhagam whose spaciality is hate mongering. If one looks at Azhvaar's own words, "saathi andhaNar" (Thirumaalai 43) it is clear that the term "andhaNar" meant the brahmin caste, so did paarpanar, etc. >Well, a Brahmin King with poor knowledge of the vedic shastras, This simply cannot be accurate if we are to believe the legend of the Azhvaar establishing Sriman Narayana as the supreme in the Pandiyan court filled with vedic scholars of opposing view. Azhvaar's words of modesty should not be confused with lack of knowledge. Nammaazhvaar says "adiyEn siRiya jyaanaththan." I am sure no one would take these words literally? Thanks, -- Dileepan