| You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : November 1996 |
From: Mani Varadarajan (mani_at_be.com)
Date: Wed Nov 13 1996 - 12:00:50 PST
Dear Divya Prabandha rasikas, Is there any internal evidence in the perumaaL tirumozhi for kulaSEkhara mahaaraaja being "cEralar kOn" (king of kerala) as said in the taniyan? In the signature paasurams, he calls himself kUdalar kOn (king of kUdal, near madurai, right?), kozhikkOn (king of woraiyur, near Srirangam), but never says anything about cEra dESam. He also does not call himself perumaaL, which is the family name of the kerala dynasty. Was kulaSEkharan really a Malayali? ;-) Mani