Search:
Bhakti List Archives

Re: Tete - a - Tete on Bhakti Digests2.49 to 2.57

From the Bhakti List Archives

Parthasarati Dileepan • May 3, 1996 


On Fri, 3 May 1996 17:20:31 -0400 Sri. Anbil Ramaswami said:
>
>
>(ii ) In Mr. BADRI'S posting, he refers to Mr DILEEPAN'S statement regarding
>Madurakavi's "Thevu Matrariyen' being blasphemous. Our Sastras are never


      There is some misunderstanding here.  Badri is the one
      who brought "dhEvu maRRaRiyEn" first, not I.  If I understood
      Badri right, he did not say "dhEvu maRRaRiyEn"  was blasphemous.
      What I think he said was, if Madhurakavi's "dhevu maRRaRiyEn"
      is intrepreted literally, it would mean there is no Sriman Narayana;
      that would amount to blasphamy on the part of the aazhvaar.
      I don't think Badri directly or indirectly indicated that
      "dhEvu maRRaRiyEn" was blasphemous.

>AN INGENIOUS ATTEMPT TO CREATE A RIFT BETWEEN BHAGAVAAN AND BHAGAVATA?!


      No Sri. Anbil Ramaswami, I respectfully submit to you,
      neither Badri nor Mani, nor any other member of prapatti
      have any ulterior motives.


-- respectfully, Dileepan