You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : March 2000

Re: aagamA-s

From: sampath kumar (
Date: Sat Mar 11 2000 - 01:00:45 PST

--- Mani Varadarajan <>
> Sankaracharya would certainly have accepted the
> Pancaratra> entirely if it were part of the Vedic
samhita; he> would > have no choice in doing so, as he
is a Vaidika. On> the other> hand, he finds it
possible to reject its authority> in his> Brahma-Sutra
bhashya precisely because it is not> *part* of> the
Vedas, but an outside body of texts. 
> Mani

This is a very clever, very valid point. Adiyen
confesses I'd never thought of it before in that

According to you, Sankara's endorsement can be
regarded almost as a "litmus-test" to check if the
aagamA-s are Vedic or not! Applying this test, I
agree, the aagama will undoubtedly fail the "test" of

Which still leaves us with the question what business
we (all who like to believe we are adherents of true
Veda-Vedanta tradition) have inside a temple which is
'aagami-c' but can never be said to be genuinely

Food for thought!
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.

                  - SrImate raamaanujaaya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to:
Visit for more information

@Backup- Protect and Access your data any time, any where on the net.
Try @Backup FREE and recieve 300 points from Install now:

-- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault