Re: Partha's Sarathy-Why??

From the Bhakti List Archives

Prabhu Srinivas • May 9, 2001

From: "Ram Anbil" 
Subject: Re: Partha's Sarathy-Why??

>>>Dear Malolan:
My understanding is that in Krishnavatara, the two were Kamsa and 
Dantavaktra and not Kamsa and Sisupala.<<<

neither. it was sisupala and dantavakra.

regards.

_____________________________________________________
Chat with your friends as soon as they come online. Get Rediff Bol at
http://bol.rediff.com






--------------------------------------------------------------
           - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to:   bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

---

• Next message: Sadagopan: "Resuming moderator duties"
• Previous message: mani_at_alum.calberkeley.org: "Re: Acharya Sambhavanai Mantras please ?"
• Next in thread: Malolan Cadambi: "Re: Partha's Sarathy-Why??"
• Reply: Malolan Cadambi: "Re: Partha's Sarathy-Why??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]