| You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : July 1999 |
From: Mani Varadarajan (mani_at_best.com)
Date: Tue Jul 27 1999 - 10:35:26 PDT
Dear Bhaktas, This whole discussion has operated under the assumption that sandhyAvandanam is something different from bhagavat-kainkaryam, and that one has to make a choice between the two. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the trikAla sandhyA and other nitya-karmas must be *included* in the category of bhagavat-kainkaryam, so much so that the whole issue of conflict between kainkaryam and nitya-karma per se should not arise. Do we not declare our nitya-karmas as "bhagavat-kainkarya rUpam" and "bhagavat prItyartham"? Now, if we say that there may be a conflict between viSesha-kainkaryam and nitya-kainkaryam, or between temple kainkaryam and kainkaryam in the form of anushThAnam, well, then I see how this needs to be resolved. Mani