| You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : July 1999 |
From: A. Bharat (kbharat_at_giasbg01.vsnl.net.in)
Date: Tue Jul 06 1999 - 14:20:27 PDT
Mani wrote: " I felt that mere praise of Sankara (and subsequent denigration of other Vaidikas, such as mImAmsakAs, as "enemies from within"), without proper context, required a response." With the feeling that Mani's comments are too succinct,I would like to add a couple of lines of explanation. Swami EmberumAnAr in the <Laghu Poorvapaksha> to the SrI BhAshya states emphatically that both PUrva-MImAmsA and Uttara-MImAmsA (VEdAnta)form a continuous whole;and for this statement he brings forward the authority of VrttikAra SwAmi BOdhAyana himself: <Vakhshyati cha karma-brahma-mImAmsayO-raika-SAstryam,"samhita- metat SArIrakam JaiminIyEna shodasha-lakshaNEnEti,SAstraikatva- siddhih"> Since VEdAnta is connected to Jaimini's 16-chaptered Poorva-MImAmsa,they both form a single SAstra. And further on SwAmi EmberumAnAr clearly explains that while PoorvaMImAmsa details the <ArAdhana- prakAra>(the method of worship),VEdAnta deals with the <ArAdhya swaroopa> (the nature of the Deity which is worshipped).Thus they are forever inter-connected, and the use of the phrase "enemies from within" in respect of MImAmsakas would hardly be appropriate. Also since in Sankara's philosophy there exists only a single attributeless entity,the question of worship and worshipper,which presupposes the existence of a second entity would not arise. I am also an admirer of Sankara's poetry and clarity of expression as in Bhaja Govindam and other Stotras.But his philosophy is a totally different matter. EmberumAnAr TiruvaDigaLE SaraNam! BHARAT