|You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : July 1995|
Date: Mon Jul 17 1995 - 08:22:47 PDT
I have been requested to write a short artcal on Sri Ramanujacharya-His life, works and Philosophy. The audience will be general Hindu public settled in the Greater Columbus, Ohio. I specifically request clarification on the following: 1. Is it right to say that we can rationalize Vishishtadvaita by saying that the individual souls are cups of water and Narayana is lik immeasurable occean? Advaita would imply that both the cup of water and the immeasurable occean are one and the same. Dvaita would say, that the cup of water and the occean are different. Mayavadis would say both the cup and water is an illusion. and the only Nirguna Brahman is reality. 2. Is it right to say that Vishishtadvaita is a compromise between Advaita and Dvaita Philosophies? 3. Advaita and Maya Vada are not interdependent? By that I mean they can stand alone as different philosophies. 4. In a broader sense, is it right to say that Christianity, Islam, and Judaism are Dvaita (Dualistic) philosophies:Whereas Buddhism and Jainism are Advaita (Non-dualistic) philosophies? 5. Prapatti follows naturally for Vishshtadvaitins, because of the realization that we are scaled down entities of that unscalable Sreeman Narayana. Concept of Prapatti is almost contradictory to Advaitis and Maya Vadis. For Dualists(Dvaitis), Prapatti is possible, may not be natural. Because it is always difficult to naturally surrender to an alien (We and God are different) even if the alien is GOD! If you wish to respond to my questions only to me, you may do so by e-Mailing to: Sreekrishna@mmd.com Thanks for your help Sincerely, K. Sreekrishna.