(no subject)

From: Raghu Seshadri (seshadri_at_hpindda.cup.hp.com)
Date: Thu Jan 04 1996 - 11:54:30 PST

• Next message: Raghu Seshadri: "(no subject)"
• Previous message: Jaganath.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Re: Avataras"
• Next in thread: Parthasarati Dileepan: "(no subject)"
• Reply: Parthasarati Dileepan: "(no subject)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

-From MFPD@UTCVM.UTC.EDU Thu Jan  4 09:42 PST 1996

  -Thanks for your clarification on the NI view
  -of Buddha avathaara.  Contrary to some Buddha
  -is indeed considered as an avathaaram, not one
  -of the dasa, by Sri Vaishnavaas.
-- Dileepan

If you go to the temple associated with
the residence of the Jeer at Srirangam,
there is a massive shrine dedicated
to the 10 avatars. Gautama is not
present there, the place being taken
by Balarama. How come ? Can the Jeer's
temple not conform to the Srivaishnava
view ?

RS

• Next message: Raghu Seshadri: "(no subject)"
• Previous message: Jaganath.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Re: Avataras"
• Next in thread: Parthasarati Dileepan: "(no subject)"
• Reply: Parthasarati Dileepan: "(no subject)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

• Bhakti List: [archives] [about]
• Sri Vaishnava Home Page