(no subject)

From: Mani Varadarajan (mani)
Date: Wed Dec 06 1995 - 12:56:52 PST

• Next message: Jay.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Acharyas of Ahobilam -4"
• Previous message: RANGASWAMY_at_plh.af.mil: "Role of Lakshmi and Nitya Suris"
• Next in thread: Parthasarati Dileepan: "(no subject)"
• Reply: Parthasarati Dileepan: "(no subject)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Murali wrote:
* 
* Well, I would tend to disagree with taming the problem so lightly, more
* because the upadesham from Narayana to Lakshmi, passed on through the
* guru parampara to our present acharya has been mentioned in no less an
* authoritative reference as Rahasya Traya Saara (RTS), which is my opinion
* as the old timers say, is the magnum opus of Vedanta Desika.
*

I looked at Rahasya Traya Saaram yesterday, and I could not 
find a direct reference to upadesam to either Lakshmi Thaayaar 
or Vishvaksenar. Perhaps Desikar knew of the logical difficulties
involved and deliberately left it ambiguous!

Mani

• Next message: Jay.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Acharyas of Ahobilam -4"
• Previous message: RANGASWAMY_at_plh.af.mil: "Role of Lakshmi and Nitya Suris"
• Next in thread: Parthasarati Dileepan: "(no subject)"
• Reply: Parthasarati Dileepan: "(no subject)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

• Bhakti List: [archives] [about]
• Sri Vaishnava Home Page