You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : December 2000

RE: [Kapila muni's sAnkhyA]

From: Chandrashekaran Venkataraman (vchandra_at_ambernetworks.com)
Date: Thu Dec 14 2000 - 09:54:52 PST

Dear Sri Hari,
   Thanks for a detailed mail on this subject. Please note 
that I wasn't in any way advocating sAnkhyam. My question 
was different. I wanted to know why is there a contrast 
between Kapila muni's svarUpam and His theory ? He being 
Sriman Narayana amsam why did he postulate a theory that 
rejects paramAthmA? Is it a foible that he was an amsam 
of Sriman Narayana ? Or
   Is it that he was just another controversial sage like 
Sage Parasurama who in spite of being Sriman Narayana amsam 
engaged in atrocities to kshathriyAs ?
   
   Thanks,
   chandrasekaran.

--------------------------------------------------------------
           - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to:   bhakti-list@eGroups.com
Search archives at http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/index.html#SEARCH