| You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : August 2000 |
From: Mani Varadarajan (mani_at_alum.calberkeley.org)
Date: Fri Aug 25 2000 - 22:24:20 PDT
Sri Madhavakkannan wrote:
> I am sorry, Sri Mani, if I have spelt out some rahasyam as I was not aware
> of it. [...] Thanks very much, Sri Mani for
> "thirutthi paNikOLLu"fying (correcting) adiyEn.
Dear Sri Madhavan,
Please don't apologize! I don't mean to say that rahasyas shouldn't be
discussed at all, but that these subjects need to be approached with
delicacy in a mixed audience. The idea of Emberumaan being a 'nAyaka'
in the SRngAra-bhAva makes sense only to those who have surrendered to him;
therein, I humbly feel, lies the rahasya. And I don't mean to correct you
but to mediate between two honest opinions.
With respect,
dAsan,
Mani
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com
Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information