| You are here: Sri Vaishnava Home Page : Bhakti List : Archives : April 2001 |
From: Malolan Cadambi (mcadambi_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Apr 08 2001 - 16:43:25 PDT
sri:
srimathe ramanujaya namaha:
Dear Bhaktas,
I have a small doubt, which is not exactly on the topic of
Visisthadvaitam, but more so in Samskrutham.
I understand that Megha Sandesham of Mahakavi Kaalidasa was rather
"infulenced by Hamsa Sandesham", this would mean that kaalidasa would
have been a figure somewhere in the 5th - 6th Centuries CE. This is
not the traditional date ascribed to kaalidasa?
Any comments on this topic?
Regards,
Daasan Malolan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/